by Terry Heick
Though I’ve been busy with TeachThought for the last four year, my original ‘trade’ was teaching English (literature, writing, digital media, etc.)
I was recently going through an old folder of reading reflection prompts and forms, and found a reading log that I called a “Self-Guided Reading Response Log” (whatever that means). It’s a few years old, but I remember using it first as a way for students to get “points” in a reading program we were doing at the time.
I thought it might be useful to share for the student-centered approach it takes, and its usefulness across content areas (depending on what you want them to analyze). It’s primarily about the craft of writing and elements of style, but 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and several others would work after reading almost anything.
And you are reading and writing in your non-ELA classroom, yes?
How I Used It
Anytime students read any text, they’d take this form and select a certain number of prompts to respond to. If they had trouble selecting the prompts that were most appropriate to their text, I’d assign them by simply circling the ones I wanted them to focus on, and handing the form back to them, but ideally they’d do this.
That was the point. I didn’t want to “school up” everything single thing they read, but I did want to help them understand the relationship between reading and writing–between craft and purpose. I wanted them to think, on their own, I read this, and I picked these questions to use to guide my writing.
By the January, they had it down and would just hand me their responses labeled accordingly. Mr. Heick, I left a reading response on your desk somewhere. I used it that year with 8th graders, and it worked well once they got used to each prompt, what they meant, and what “exemplar” models of each looked like.
This was important–they needed to see what a “quality” response looked like. I modeled a few using think-alouds, shared a few of the better examples from students, etc. I was also sure to include some quality responses that weren’t necessarily from the wordsmiths in the classroom, and was sure to include those that used diagrams, concept maps, and drawings as well. Once these questions were demystified a bit, it was all downhill.
I’d score the response, as with all writing, out of 4 in half-point increments. I used a universal rubric to score–1 point each for textual evidence, clarity, creativity, and overall quality. Easy to grade, and easy to differentiate for all reading levels, text forms, etc.
Today, this would probably make more sense as a Google Form. No forms to make copies of, nothing to lose, simple to document, so if you’re feeling industrious, knock yourself out and let us know in the comments that you’ve done so so we can use it too. I included a slightly modified version of the questions below.
In summary, these reading response questions are universal, academic, standards-based, differentiation-friendly, and allow for some degree of student-choice.
FICTION & NON-FICTION
1. Why did you decide to read this material?
2. Compare and contrast this text or media with related text/media.
Be specific–what text or media, what are the similarities and dissimilarities, etc.
3. What did the author’s purpose seem to be?
What seemed to be the Author’s Purpose in creating this text? Why do you think they might’ve written it? What were they hoping this text would accomplish? Why do you think so?
4. What can you tell me about the theme?
What was the theme? What were some of the theme topics (love lost, overcoming adversity, civic responsibility, etc.)? What is the author’s overall message to their audience? Is there a sentence you can choose from the text that captures that? What supporting details allow you to make this inference?
5. What is the author’s position on any relevant theme or issue?
As a result of this reading, what can you infer is the author’s position on any relevant theme or issue? This will often be a social issue–poverty, love, war, courage, race, etc.
6. Who is the audience?
Who wants or needs to know this information? Does there seem to be a specific audience the author is trying to reach? Why do you think so? If not, what makes you think there is not a specific audience?
7. What is the overall tone of the work?
What does the author’s general attitude towards their audience? How do the language, content, imagery, and allusions combine to give the reading a “feel,” or tone? What details help you to understand this? What can you infer about the author’s position on important themes or issues because of that tone?
8. What point of view does the author write from?
What point of view was the book written from? What does the author seem to assume is true? Is the author biased in any way? Does the author seem to be aware of this bias? Might it be done on purpose to further the theme? Is it satirical? Ironic?
9. What are the most relevant supporting details?
What is the relationship between the author’s purpose, thesis or theme, and supporting details?
10. How is the book structured?
What structural elements did you notice in the book? How did these elements impact your understanding of the content? Were there any text features that were super helpful—or just plain annoying? What could they have done differently, and what effect would that change have had?
11. How would you describe the author’s writing style?
What elements of the author’s writing style did you notice? How do these elements impact your understanding or enjoyment of the text?
12. Does the author have credibility to write about this subject or topic?
Why or why not? Be specific.
13. What is the general mood of the text?
What is the author’s general attitude toward their topic? What details makes you think so? How would this text make most people ‘feel’? What is the relationship between the tone, mood, and purpose?
14. How is the plot, argument, or information organized?
Cause/effect? Chronological order? Compare/contrast? Question/answer? Lots of options here–be specific, and defend your answer.
15. What would you change?
Choose one important part of this reading that the author could’ve made a different choice—the structure, organization, purpose, audience, characterization, pacing, supporting details, mood, etc.—and then explain how they could’ve done it differently, and what effect it would’ve had on the reading.
Create your own response. Be creative, playful, and fun. If it’s not any of the three, I’ll hand it back.
17. Index the characters
List the full name of all characters you’d consider important (be prepared why you included someone or left them out). For each character, include one line from the text characterizing them; also, label each character as major/minor, flat/round, and static/dynamic character.
18. Could you connect with any of the characters?
Could you see yourself in this character at all, in any major or minor way? How did this affect your reading?
19. What were the (significant) characters motivated by?
What were the significant characters motivated by? What was the protagonist motivated most by? How did this affect their experience in the story? Was their source of motivation something that you could relate to?
19 Reading Response Questions For Self-Guided Response; image flickr user thomasguinard; 19 Reading Response Questions That Work With Most Texts